article · Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies
Purpose This study examines return spillovers between the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) equity markets and key international indices, including Brent crude oil, gold, the US dollar index (DXY), US Treasury bonds (T-bonds) and the CBOE crude oil volatility index (OVX), both before and after the removal of fuel subsidies in the GCC. Design/methodology/approach We employed the time-varying parameter vector autoregression model of Antonakakis et al. (2020), which captures evolving covariance structures without relying on fixed-parameter rolling windows, similar to Diebold and Yilmaz’s (2012, 2014) spillover index method. Additionally, we use an unrestricted VAR-based Granger non-causality test to examine the relationships among GCC stocks, oil prices and volatility across the subsidy reform period. Findings The results reveal heterogeneity in oil–stock price interactions, with UAE markets exhibiting bidirectional causality both before and after subsidy removal, whereas Saudi Arabia’s stock prices are related only to oil prices prior to the reforms. Oil volatility consistently impacts all GCC markets. Connectedness analysis identifies gold and the DXY as net receivers, confirming their safe haven roles, while interest rates and OVX serve as persistent net transmitters. The post-reform return spillover dynamics shift, with the UAE and Qatar equities, interest rates and OVX emerging as key net transmitters. Originality/value This is the first empirical study on the impact of GCC subsidy removal on oil–stock market interconnectedness that offers valuable insights for investors and policymakers. This underscores the importance of adjusting sovereign wealth fund allocations toward low-carbon, oil-uncorrelated assets, integrating oil volatility into macroprudential frameworks and leveraging the fiscal space for sustainable development without compromising financial stability.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1108/jabes-03-2025-0105
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.