article
<bold>Introduction:</bold> Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is started after overnight titration. We aimed to assess the correlation between titration location and CPAP compliance. <bold>Methods:</bold> Patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and treated by CPAP [2019-2024] were included. CPAP compliance was evaluated after 1 year of follow-up. It was defined by the use of at least 4 hours per night for 70% of the nights. Two groups were compared: G1 (Home titration) and G2 (In-hospital titration). <bold>Results:</bold> We included 272 patients (G1: 236, G2: 36). Mean age: [G1:58+/-10 vs G2: 61 +/-10 years; p= NS]. Mean BMI: [G1: 36.4 vs G2: 40.2 Kg/m²; p=0.002]. Cardiovascular comorbidities were more frequent in G2 (p=0.008). Epworth score before treatment was: [G1:11,59 vs G2: 11.57; p=NS]. Mean effective pressure level was: [G1: 9 vs G2: 10 cm H20; p= NS]. Initial acceptance rates were similar in the 2 groups (p= NS), with similar tolerance during first night use (p= NS). The compliance was better in G2 (83% vs 58%; p=0.04) with a better impact on daytime sleepiness (p=0.013) and subjective sleep quality (p=0.007), fewer side effects (p= NS), fewer leaks (p= NS) and fewer residual events (p= 0.01). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> In-hospital titration of CPAP seems to provide better first-year compliance.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2025.pa5635
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.