article · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Abstract Background Instrumental delivery is a dying art, that needs proper training and practice to revive it and help decrease cesarean delivery rates. This study aimed to declare the obstetricians’ attitude towards instrumental delivery and to elaborate the its possible causes. Methods A descriptive cross- sectional study was conducted via an online survey between January 1and April 1, 2025. It was distributed to obstetricians in Egypt. The questionnaire included two main sectors: sector (one) inquired about the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants; sector (two) included the physicians’ attitudes and practices towards instrumental delivery in Egypt. Results Seventy-three (52.5%) of the obstetricians never tried ID before. Eighty-nine (64%) of the obstetricians declined encouraging ID if in a situation that indicated the use of ID. Possible reasons for abandoning ID included reduction of training (116/139, 83.5%), lack of senior supervision (99/139, 71.2%), fear of litigation (125/139, 89.9%), lack of consultant supervision in acute situations (108/139, 77.7%), and lack of modern equipment (108/139, 77.7%). Conclusion Instrumental delivery is not widely practiced in Egypt. A great proportion of the obstetricians declined to perform/try instrumental delivery in urgent situations.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-026-09077-2
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.