MARATTO

article · Marine Ecology Progress Series

Nutritional qualities partially predict diet of amphipod grazers: implications for modern coastal biofilms in microbialite pools

Abstract

Mobile metazoans in the Phanerozoic transformed shallow coastal habitats covered in biofilms into bioturbated mixed grounds. Benthic biofilms during this time rarely preserved into the fossil record as microbialites, and more specifically their layered form, stromatolites. Living microbialites are rare for this reason, in addition to other factors such as unfavourable modern geochemical conditions. Counterintuitively, macroinvertebrate grazers and laminated stromatolites coexist along the Nelson Mandela Bay coastline, South Africa. Here we aimed to determine if nutritional qualities of algae in these microbialite pools are linked to the diet of a dominant amphipod grazer, Melita zeylanica Stebbing, 1904. We assessed this in 3 microbialite pools using stable isotopes coupled to seasonal shifts in abundant food resources of microbialite biofilms and exposed (bleached and rimstone) or submerged (pool) macroalgae, Ulva spp. Amphipod diet was proportional to the quantity available (biomass) and nutritional properties of available algal food (energy, protein, total phosphorus and C:N ratios). Macroalgae in all states were the most nutritious, and the diet of M. zeylanica was dominated by submerged macroalgae. Although microbialite material had the worst nutritional profile, it was consumed in larger quantities compared to exposed bleached and rimstone macroalgae. Therefore, factors unrelated to nutritional profiles, such as predation, allelopathy or exposure risks, likely drive food choices. High levels of grazing on nutritious pool macroalgae likely releases most of the grazing pressure on the microbialite biofilm, therefore partially explaining why the microbialites can persist in this environment instead of being bioturbated through foraging.

Research topics

  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3354/meps14585

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.