MARATTO

preprint · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Numerical Simulation of the Bending Behavior of a Topologically Optimized Structure Printed in ABS by FDM: G-Code-Driven Mapping of Local Material Orientations

Abstract

This preprint presents an original dual-branch numerical pipeline for simulating the bending behavior of an MBB (Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm) beam, topologically optimized using the SIMP method and manufactured in ABS by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Starting from a single G-code file generated in OrcaSlicer, two parallel processing branches are derived in Python: (i) a faithful 3D mesostructural reconstruction via the CadQuery library, producing STEP geometries for the architectural characterization of three studied raster orientations (0°, 45°, 90°); (ii) an automatic mapping of local deposition directions onto the centroids of the ANSYS mesh elements via a k-NN algorithm (KD-tree, O(N log N)), enabling the assignment of a locally oriented orthotropic elasticity tensor to each element through APDL commands (EMODIF, ESYS), using material constants from Somireddy and Czekanski (2017). The SIMP optimization produces a structure retaining 30% of the initial volume for a 6.6% reduction in bending deflection. The comparative simulation across orientations reveals that the 90° orientation offers the best mechanical performance (Dmax = 0.136 mm, -54.4% vs. 0°), consistent with the architectural mechanisms identified from the reconstructed mesostructures. This work has not undergone external peer review at the time of this deposit and is shared as a numerical baseline pending experimental validation. Python scripts and APDL command blocks are included in the appendices for reproducibility. This manuscript is currently under review at Rapid Prototyping Journal (Emerald).

Research topics

  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Cellular and Composite Structures

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21953255

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.