article · Results in Engineering
Traditional injera baking across Sub-Saharan Africa still relies on highly inefficient biomass cookstoves, causing severe thermal losses, high operating costs, indoor smoke exposure, and broader environmental and economic costs. Biogas offers a clean, renewable alternative, but achieving uniform radial temperature distribution across large-diameter clay baking pans (Mitad, D > 48 cm) remains a major technical challenge. To address this, a biogas-fueled, three-ring concentric burner system featuring two intersecting central channels for balanced biogas distribution and inward-inclined flame ports was developed and evaluated using a decoupled two-stage 3D multiphysics numerical model built in COMSOL Multiphysics. The model couples turbulent reactive flow (k-ε), Eddy-Dissipation combustion kinetics, surface-to-surface (P1) radiative transfer, conjugate heat transfer, and a transient moisture evaporation sub-model. Validation against experimental benchmarks confirmed strong predictive accuracy (MAE = 3.12°C, RMSE = 4.08°C, R² = 0.94, GCI = 0.24%). The optimized burner achieved an average pan surface temperature of 185.4°C, a peak of 212°C, and superior radial thermal uniformity (±8.5°C). Surface heat flux integration yielded an overall thermal efficiency of 61.2% ± 2.1% and a specific fuel consumption of 0.29 kg biogas/kg Injera a 28.0% ± 2.2% gain in net heat transfer efficiency and a 20.0% ± 1.8% reduction in baking time relative to traditional three-stone wood-burning stoves (8% efficiency), with peak moisture evaporation reaching 0.020 kg/m²s during the initial flash-off phase. These results show that multi-ring aerodynamic staging with controlled swirling flow overcomes the thermal non-uniformities limiting biogas injera stoves, offering a validated design tool for scaling clean cooking technologies across Sub-Saharan Africa in support of SDGs 3, 7, and 13.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112390
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.