MARATTO

review · Perioperative Medicine

Non-fasting versus fasting before percutaneous cardiac procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

20254 citationsOpen accessAlexandria University

In plain language

The abstract on record is too brief for a reliable plain-language summary, so none has been generated.

Abstract

The non-fasting protocol demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, and overall satisfaction to the conventional fasting approach. REVIEW REGISTRATION : PROSPERO CRD42024586147.

Research topics

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Hospital Admissions and Outcomes

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00485-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.