article · Universe
The Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space (ACES) mission, currently operating aboard the International Space Station (ISS), is designed to provide high-precision time and frequency measurements and to test fundamental aspects of relativistic physics. Gravitational redshift (GRS), a fundamental prediction of General Relativity (GR), implies that clocks positioned at different gravitational potentials experience relative time dilation. Previous GRS experiments have focused primarily on microwave technologies, with negligible experimental coverage in the optical domain, particularly for ground-to-space links. Motivated by the European Laser Timing (ELT) experiment and the high-precision laser-cooled cesium clock aboard ACES, we introduce and evaluate an optical time-transfer method designed to achieve high-accuracy measurements of GRS. In the absence of actual ELT/ACES optical data, a high-fidelity numerical simulation framework was developed to assess the performance of this method. The framework incorporates representative ELT/ACES mission parameters, including the space-based cesium clock and the H-MASER clock located at the reference ground station, both providing frequency stability at the level of 10−15 for 1000 s averaging time. Applying a ±1σ filtering criterion, we obtain a simulated dataset comprising 33 ELT/ACES passes, representing a total observation time of 4.38 h over a single week. Analysis of this high-fidelity dataset reveals a GRS deviation from GR of (−7.19±0.63)×10−5, achieving a 3.4 orders of magnitude improvement over the best previous laser-ranging experiment conducted at the University of Maryland (UMD), USA, 51 years ago. These simulation results demonstrate that the optical time-transfer link constitutes a powerful tool for testing fundamental physics and, when combined with next-generation optical atomic clocks, enables unprecedented capabilities in space-based timekeeping and geoscience applications.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/universe12030082
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.