article · Scientific Reports
From the useless municipal solid waste (MSW) ashes, CeO<sub>2</sub>, Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and CeO<sub>2</sub> + Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> doped borosilicate glasses were organized via melting-quenching procedure. Various optical, structural, physical and radiation shielding parameters were examined towards the influence of 100 kGy of γ-radiation. UV-visible NIR spectra revealed UV peaks at 351, 348 and 370 nm corresponding to the trivalent states of Ce<sup>3+</sup> and Gd<sup>3+</sup> ions, while, photoluminescence (PL) spectra displayed asymmetric broad excitations of Ce<sup>3+</sup> and Gd<sup>3+</sup> ions due to 4f → 5d transitions, and emission intense bands at 412, 434, and 417 nm. CIE chromaticity shows that Gd<sup>3+</sup> ions increase the luminescence of Ce<sup>3+</sup>. FTIR absorption bands revealed an overlapping between tetrahedral groups of silicate (SiO<sub>4</sub>), with trigonal (BO<sub>3</sub>) and tetrahedral (BO<sub>4</sub>) units of borate. The influence of 100 kGy obtains quite reduction in UV-visible NIR and PL peaks, large stability in FTIR and ESR spectra, and stability of thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) as well. The whole data revealed optical, structural and physical stability of glasses after irradiation besides an enhancement in microhardness owing to more structural compactness and high bonding connectivity. Radiation shielding parameters from Phy<sub>-</sub>X/PSD program showed higher values of mass (MAC) and linear attenuation coefficients (LAC), and effective atomic number (Z<sub>eff</sub>) in the order of; glass <sub>Ce+Gd</sub> > glass <sub>Ce</sub> > glass <sub>Gd</sub>. Ce + Gd doped glass revealed also the lowest half value layer (HVL) comparing to other shielding commercial concretes. The study recommends the beneficial and economical use of the useless MSW ash to produce CeO<sub>2</sub> and/or Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> borosilicate glasses with hopeful radiation shielding features.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63207-4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.