MARATTO

article · International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology

New Numerical Score and Stepwise Algorithm for the Classification and Management of Laryngomalacia

20252 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b> The classification and management of laryngomalacia are challenging topics that are continuously updated and modified by pediatric airway surgeons. However, a numerical stratification of the patients to decide on the conservative management or intervention has not yet been established. <b>Objective</b> To provide an easy approach to cases of laryngomalacia by adopting an updated scoring system with a stepwise management algorithm. <b>Methods</b> We conducted a prospective study that included patients diagnosed with laryngomalacia over three years. The proposed symptom and history score was used to categorize patients into mild, moderate, and severe grades. Then, the examination and investigation scores designed were applied to the selected cases according to the management algorithm. Basic data from the patients and their flow throughout the study were assessed. <b>Results</b> The study included 112 patients with a mean age of 4.3 ± 2.2 months. In total, 44 (39.3%) cases were considered mild, 48 (42.86%), moderate, and 20 (17.85%), severe. The examination score was used to assess 68 out of 112 patients, including all moderate and severe cases of laryngomalacia. All of the mild cases were followed up, and none required surgery. The investigation score was applied to 55 cases, including all the severe cases, as preoperative evaluation, and 35 out of 48 moderate cases. <b>Conclusion</b> This newly proposed scoring system with the associated algorithm is an easily applicable way to deal with, classify, and properly manage laryngomalacia cases.

Research topics

  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Voice and Speech Disorders

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801317

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.