MARATTO

article · QJM

Neuropathic Pain and Clinical Sensory Testing in Young Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

2024Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Abstract Background The pathophysiology of pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex and not fully understood. Neuropathic pain (NP) is an emerging theory of chronic pain in SCD. Nevertheless, assessment of NP is not a part of standard care of patients with SCD. Aim and Objectives To study the frequency of neuropathic pain among young patients with SCD by ID-P questionnaire and Clinical Sensory Testing (CST). Patients and Methods In this cross-sectional study Patients with SCD were recruited and data were collected on sociodemographic and clinical criteria of the disease. ID Pain (ID-P) questionnaire was used as a screening tool for NP. We performed a bedside clinical sensory testing (CST) including cold, warm, and pressure detection, cold, heat, mechanical and pressure pain threshold. Results Fifty-six participants were screened for eligibility and twelve of them were excluded; ten had stroke and two patients were diabetic. A total of 44 participants (25 males and 19 females) were included, their mean age was 12.4 years (SD 4.8; range 5.9-25 years). Screening of NP using the ID-P questionnaire revealed that 22.7% of the study cohort likely had NP. On the other hand, 34% of the participants had abnormal CST; 10 patients (22.7%) had abnormal mechanical pain threshold, 6 (13.6%) showed abnormal cold pain threshold, 2 (4.5%) had abnormal heat pain threshold and 2 (4.5%) with abnormal pressure threshold, while only one patient had delayed cold detection. Conclusion Neuropathic pain, as assessed by ID-P questionnaire and CST, is not uncommon in young patients with SCD.

Research topics

  • Neurological and metabolic disorders
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.734

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.