MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Sustainability

Net greenhouse gas balances of South African pasture-based dairy farms: results from the DESTiny biogenic carbon model

Abstract

Dairy production is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yet the full biogenic carbon balance of pasture-based dairy systems remains poorly quantified. The DESTiny framework, a biogenic carbon system dynamics model, was used to calculate net GHG balances for 12 pasture-based dairy farms in South Africa's Garden Route. Farms were grouped as low-, moderate-, or high-input based on fertilizer use, purchased feed, stocking rate, conservation tillage, and forage self-sufficiency. Eleven of the 12 farms exhibited negative net GHG balances. Farm balances ranged from −15,211 to +6,764 t CO 2 e year −1 , and carbon intensity per kg of fat-and-protein-corrected milk (FPCM) ranged from −2.21 to +0.53 kg CO 2 e kg −1 FPCM (median −0.83 kg CO 2 e kg −1 FPCM). Low-input farms showed the most negative intensities (median −1.09 kg CO 2 e kg −1 FPCM), followed by moderate-input farms (−0.94 kg CO 2 e kg −1 FPCM), while high-input farms varied widely and included the only net source. External inputs (mostly purchased feed) and enteric methane each contributed approximately 40% of gross emissions. Farms achieving the greatest carbon accumulation potential typically combined high feed efficiency, strong milk solids, legume-rich pastures, conservation tillage, and near-complete reliance on home-grown forage. These results indicate that management decisions matter more than input intensity and that well-managed pasture-based dairies in this region can maintain a negative net carbon flux, transforming them from traditional emitters into verifiable climate assets.

Research topics

  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/frsus.2026.1703271

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.