article · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Academic careers seldom follow a single path, yet universities remain organised around a binary distinction between administrative and scholarly roles. This paper uses analytic autoethnography to trace my transition from university administrator to scholar-administrator at an African university, examining how personal agency and institutional structures together shaped that journey. Drawing on Bourdieu’s (1986) theory of field, habitus and capital and Whitchurch’s ‘third space’, I argue that the scholar-administrator occupies a peripheral space, holding a transitional position characterised by ongoing tension among competing professional identities, cultural expectations and reward systems. The narrative shows how rigid job classifications, gatekeeping mechanisms and misaligned incentives limit the adoption of hybrid roles. These findings highlight a need for universities, especially those in the global South where massification and resource constraints heighten such tensions, to recognise scholar-administrator roles through formal policies, flexible workload arrangements and enhanced mentoring for those following non-traditional academic paths.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/1360080x.2026.2687832
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.