article · Sustainable Futures
Public procurement consumes a considerable portion of government finances; as a result, it has to be executed effectively and efficiently while observing good governance and professionalism. However, the claims for insufficient legal framework, limited transparency and unfair competition have led to concerns about whether the procurement processes deliver value for money. Therefore, the study assessed whether the legal, institutional and procedural arrangements influence value for money achievement in government financed procurement. The findings indicate that institutional factors ( B = 0.853; p = 0.000), compliance with procurement procedures ( B = 0.502; p = 0.000), and staff competency ( B = 0.384; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of value for money achievement. Therefore, the observed institutional, procedural and competency related practices need to be strengthened to improve procurement performance and ultimately value for money. Nevertheless, there is a need to strengthen contract management practices through comprehensive reforms that integrate legal and procedural improvements while enhancing capacity building.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101685
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.