article · Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly promoted to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss, but the consequences of scaling up NbS for biological invasions, an acknowledged biological crisis, remain poorly synthesised. We evaluate how NbS can influence the establishment, spread, and impacts of non-native species. We discuss mechanisms underpinning beneficial invasion outcomes, including enhanced biotic resistance through native species restoration, targeted invasive species control, and carefully implemented managed relocation. Conversely, inappropriately designed NbS, particularly those involving non-native species introductions, weakened dispersal barriers through trade, altered disturbance regimes, or inadequate implementation in degraded ecosystems, can worsen invasion outcomes. Integrating invasion science into NbS planning, supported by robust risk assessment and long-term monitoring, is essential to ensure multi-benefit outcomes under global change.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2026.04.006
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.