article · QJM
Abstract Background Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. It represents one of the most frequent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is the primary cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The early detection of inflammatory biomarkers is essential in reducing complications related to the disease. Objective To investigate N-Cadherin in serum as a screening and diagnostic indicator for assessing diabetic nephropathy in diabetic patients. Methods An observational study carried out in 6 months included 90 patients with type 2 diabetes mellites equally divided into 3 groups: Those without diabetic nephropathy (group 1), those with microalbuminuria (group 2), does with macroalbuminuria (group 3). Results N-cadherin levels were increased in diabetic nephropathy compared to those without diabetic nephropathy (p value: 0.000), and most importantly there is significant increase in N-cadherin level between microalbuminuria group and normoalbuminuric (p value: <0.001). Also this study revealed significant difference between reading of 3 groups regarding 2hPP, HbA1c, TC, LDL, BUN and creatinine (p value: 0.000, 0.005, 0.003, 0.003, 0.006 and 0.024 respectively). We found a significant negative correlation between N-cadherin and eGFR (P value: 0.014) which indicates that N-cadherin is an important marker in renal disease. Our study had given us an Abstract about the role of the N-cadherin in prediction of detecting DN early and in monitoring treatment outcomes. Conclusion This study provides preliminary evidence suggesting N-cadherin as a novel renal biomarker associated with increased albuminuria and decreased eGFR levels in type 2 diabetic patients which can be used as a valuable prognostic and diagnostic tool to slow down or even inhibit ESRD. The study has also demonstrated that N-cadherin levels increased in microalbuminuria group of diabetic nephropathy compared to those without diabetic nephropathy.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.464
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.