MARATTO

article

MULTISTAGE CAUSTIC LEACHING DE-ASHING OF NIGERIAN LAFIA-OBI COAL

201115 citations

Abstract

Fractions of the high ash Nigerian Lafia-Obi coal L±250 ground to pass the 250 µm sieve in three stages were subjected to proximate/ash composition analyses, hot aqueous leaching de-ashing with water and sodium carbonate in multiple stages and in a H2O-Na2CO3-H2O sequence (with initial solution homogenization). The results obtained showed that ash contents percent of 24.60, 14.70 and 24.07 were obtained for fractions L-250(1), L-250(2) and L+250(2); respectively as against 32.55% in the as-received coal. The ash reductions obtained translate to overall average ash removal of about 38.66% at the 19.90% ash content of the concentrates blend at a good 1:20 ratio of reagent to coal. The study also showed that a three stage leaching in the sequence H2ONa2CO3-H2O (HSH) produced a higher leaching rate than Na2CO3-H2O-H2O (SHH). The ash content of the concentrates blend at 19.90% is lower than 23.80% required for coal blends for Indian standard coking practice, but higher than the maximum of 10% upper limit for the conventional cokemaking practice. The reduction in ash content obtained at the atmospheric pressure treatment of Lafia-Obi coal was found to compare favourably with that of a high pressure elevated temperature autoclave leaching of an Illinois coal. Binary blend formulation between the prime coking western Canada coal and Lafia-Obi coal as-leached showed that inclusion of 16.63% of the latter was probable and this translates to reduction in cost per ton of about $23.67. A successful upgrade of the leaching route derived to industrial scale will make Lafia-Obi coal available as a blend component for economical cokemaking.

Research topics

  • Mineral Processing and Grinding
  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Renewable energy and sustainable power systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.