article · Archives of Public Health
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive public health issue and a violation of human rights, disproportionately affecting women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Despite efforts to mitigate gender-based violence, IPV remains alarmingly prevalent. This study aims to assess the twelve-month prevalence of IPV and its associated factors among ever-partnered reproductive-age women in Sub-Saharan Africa using recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 2019 to 2024. A multilevel analysis study was conducted using DHS datasets from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries, with a weighted sample of 62,218 ever-partnered women aged 15–49. IPV was measured across three dimensions: emotional, physical, and sexual violence. A two-level mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to analyze individual, household, and community-level predictors of IPV. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The findings revealed that the twelve-month prevalence of IPV was 28.85% (95% CI: 28.49–29.21), with emotional violence being the most common form (22.97%), followed by physical (16.62%) and sexual violence (6.16%). Younger women, particularly those aged 15–24 (AOR = 1.12) and 25–34 (AOR = 1.19), had a higher odds of IPV compared to those aged 35–49. Having no educational status (AOR = 1.39), primary education (AOR = 1.46), or secondary education (AOR = 1.40), justifying wife-beating (AOR = 1.42), experiencing partner jealousy (AOR = 4.11), and witnessing maternal abuse (AOR = 2.11) were all significantly associated with IPV. Furthermore, women in male-headed households (AOR = 1.20) and those from poor wealth backgrounds (AOR = 1.74) were more vulnerable to IPV. IPV remains prevalent in Sub-Saharan Africa, driven by individual, household, and socio-cultural factors. Addressing it requires legal reforms, education, economic empowerment, and community-based interventions. Integrating IPV prevention into healthcare and social services is crucial to protecting women’s well-being.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s13690-026-01881-8
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.