article · ERJ Open Research
Background The World Health Organization-endorsed Xpert MTB/XDR assay provides a rapid method to detect resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, injectables aminoglycosides and ethionamide, yet evaluation of its performance, particularly in endemic settings, remains limited. Methods We conducted a prospective multicentre study (June 2017 to March 2021) in nine sub-Saharan African countries, enrolling adults with pulmonary tuberculosis confirmed by Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra. Xpert MTB/XDR results were compared to a World Health Organization-endorsed targeted next-generation sequencing reference used on the same sputum, with discordance resolved using whole genome sequencing and phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing when available. Diagnostic accuracy for each drug was calculated, also accounting for genotypic heteroresistance detection. Results Among 1238 included patients, Xpert MTB/XDR demonstrated high specificity (≥98%) across all drugs yet showed variable sensitivity, detecting 606 out of 637 isoniazid-resistant (95%, 95% CI 94–97%), 22 out of 33 fluoroquinolones-resistant (67%, 95% CI 48–81%) and 159 out of 279 ethionamide-resistant (57%, 95% CI 51–63%) samples. The assay reliably detected most common resistance-conferring mutations, such as katG _S315T, fabG1 _C-15T, and gyrA _A90V and D94G, yet failed to detect low-frequency heteroresistance (≤10–35%) and off-target mutations, mostly for ethionamide. Amikacin resistance was rare (0.2%). Sensitivity for fluoroquinolones was higher (78%) among rifampicin-resistant samples, highlighting its utility as a reflex test in rifampicin-resistant patients. Conclusions Xpert MTB/XDR offers rapid diagnosis of resistance with high specificity. While limitations in detecting low-frequency and off-target variants affect its sensitivity, most frequent, fixed in-target mutations are readily detected. Future studies should evaluate strategies to integrate Xpert MTB/XDR with other diagnostic approaches in national tuberculosis programmes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00427-2025
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.