MARATTO

article · Marine Pollution Bulletin

Multi-indicator appraisal of potentially toxic elements pollution in the southeastern Mediterranean Sea harbours: Unraveling sources, acute ecotoxicity and health risks

20252 citationsOpen accessArish University

Abstract

This study evaluates contamination levels and ecological risks of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in sediments and seawater across three Egyptian harbours: Sidi Krir, El-Dikhaila, and Western Harbour. Western Harbour exhibited the highest PTE concentrations, with Zn (134.93 mg/kg), Cu (88.38 mg/kg), Pb (103.6 mg/kg), and Cd (1.21 mg/kg) surpassing other sites by up to 4-fold. Ecological risk assessments revealed considerable hazards, particularly for Cd (Er = 121.67), and moderate to substantial risks for Cu and Pb (mHQ = 1.21–2.37). Partition coefficients indicated Cu and Pb mobility from sediment to water, with Pb exceeding China's Grade I thresholds in the water column. Multivariate analysis linked PTEs to industrial and shipping activities. Acute risk quotients identified Cu (RQ > 100 for invertebrates) and Zn (RQ > 10 for algae) as primary toxicants. Cadmium posed a lifetime cancer risk (LCR > 10 −4 ) for children via ingestion, highlighting significant ecological and health concerns. • Integrated risk ranked harbours: Western Harbour > El-Dikhaila Harbour > Sidi Krir Harbour. • Cu, Pb, and Zn tend to partition into seawater (3 < LogK d < 4), while Cd remains in the dissolved phase ( LogK d < 3). • Risk quotients ( RQ MEC/PNEC and RQ STU ) revealed acute ecological risks to invertebrates>algae>fish. • Sediment posed minimal health concerns ( THQ < 1; LCR < 10 −6 ). • Seawater showed low non-carcinogenic risks ( THQ < 1), but elevated carcinogenic risk from Cd ( LCR > 10 −4 ).

Research topics

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118599

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.