article · IEEE Access
With the use of cutting-edge demand management at the system or home level and powerful network reconfiguration tools, smart grids are expected to introduce advanced hardware and software resources to strengthen the operation of power systems. This article describes a Modified Gradient-Based Optimization (MGBO) algorithm for Distributed Generation (DG) and capacitors integration in distribution feeders. To increase the variety of the produced searching individuals, the suggested MGBO combines the basic Gradient Searching Method (GSM) and Local Escape Mechanism (LEM) with a binomial crossover strategy. This combined cross-over strategy upgrades the forthcoming searching individuals to be more random. The LEM assists in evading local optima, whereas the GSM guides the searching scan to promising regions and facilitates its convergence to the optimum solution. The suggested MGBO method is designed and implemented to improve the performance of radial distribution networks by reducing technical power losses while taking into account the peak loading. Its relevance is tested on a practical radial 59-bus Cairo distribution feeder in Egypt and a large-scale radial 135-bus distribution feeder. The proposed MGBO is compared with the original GBO, Manta ray foraging optimization (MRFO) and honey badger algorithm (HBA). The whole comparison of the suggested MGBO with the original GBO and the newly developed optimization algorithms demonstrates that the suggested MGBO derives the best performance in all of the cases studied. For the practical radial 59-bus Cairo distribution feeder in Egypt, the proposed MGBO shows great improvement of 18.40%, 20.17%, and 2.29% in robustness indicator of the standard deviation compared with GBO, MRFO, and HBA, respectively. For the large-scale radial 135-bus distribution feeder, the proposed MGBO shows great improvement of 46.92%, 62.94%, and 67.87% in robustness indicator of the standard deviation compared with GBO, MRFO, and HBA, respectively.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3326758
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.