MARATTO

article · Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals

Mineralogy and geochemical characterization of geophagic clays consumed in parts of southern Nigeria

202310 citationsOpen accessOsun State University

Abstract

This study seeks to determine health risk associated with consumption of clay in different areas in southern Nigeria. Different clay samples sold for consumption were purchased from Mowe, Ikorodu and Onitsha Markets in southern Nigeria. The clays were subjected to mineralogical and geochemical characterization using X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic EmissionSpectrometry. Potential health risk assessment was calculated using a standardized Hazard Quotient (HQ) and Total Hazard Index (THI). XRD and FTIR results revealed the clay contains varying percentage of quartz, kaolinite, anatase, halite, pyrite, goethite, smectite and palygorskite while geochemical analysis result revealed wide range of elemental concentration (ppm). Mean concentration (ppm) of Cu, Pb, Zn, Cr, Ni and Co from the markets are 5.8 – 8; 17.4 – 29.6; 32.4 – 95.8;111.6 – 103.4; 18.6 – 39.4 and 4 – 16.6 respectively while As was below detection limit in most of the samples. HQ values were used to calculate the THI. THI values for children and adults for Mowe market samples range from 0.9 to 2.1 and 0.5–1.1 respectively, for Ikorodu market samples, THI for children and adult ranges from 1.0- 1.8 and 0.6–1.0 respectively, while THI for children and adults for Onitsha market samples ranges from 1.5 to 2.6 and 0.8–1.84 respectively. In conclusion, children that consume clay from the markets are more exposed to non-carcinogenic risks than adults. It is therefore advisable that the clays should not be consumed for a long period of time to avoid health problems.

Research topics

  • Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemin.2023.100063

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.