MARATTO

article · Island Arc

Mineral chemistry and petrogenesis of chromitites from the<scp>K</scp>hoy ophiolite complex,<scp>N</scp>orthwestern<scp>I</scp>ran:<scp>I</scp>mplications for aggregation of two ophiolites

In plain language

The Khoy ophiolitic complex in Northwestern Iran comprises two distinct sections: an older Eastern ophiolite and a Late Cretaceous Western ophiolite. Mineral analysis separates the chromitites within the complex into two distinct groups. High-aluminium chromitites from the Eastern section likely originated from interactions between a mid-ocean-ridge basalt-like melt and depleted harzburgite in a back-arc basin. These rocks show evidence of moderate partial melting. In contrast, the Western section contains high-chromium chromitites formed during two stages of arc development, involving island-arc-tholeiite and boninitic melts reacting with highly depleted harzburgite in a supra-subduction zone. Western chromitites also contain inclusions of clinopyroxene, olivine, and platinum-group mineral-bearing sulfides. These mineral and geochemical differences demonstrate that the Khoy complex represents a tectonic aggregation of two separate ophiolitic units that developed in different tectonic settings and geological time periods.

Key takeaways

  • Chromitites from the Eastern Khoy ophiolite are high-aluminium types formed in a back-arc basin setting through reactions with mid-ocean-ridge basalt-like melts.
  • Western Khoy chromitites are high-chromium types formed in a supra-subduction zone from island-arc-tholeiite and boninitic melts.
  • Inclusions within the Western chromitites contain olivine, clinopyroxene, and sulfides bearing platinum group minerals.
  • The Khoy ophiolitic complex represents a tectonic assembly of two distinct ophiolites formed at different geological times and environments.

Why it matters

Understanding how ophiolite complexes assemble offers insight into the tectonic history and evolution of ancient ocean basins. By identifying the geochemical signatures of chromitites and associated minerals, geologists can decipher complex plate boundary processes, mantle melting histories, and the mechanisms that bring together diverse fragments of oceanic crust and upper mantle over geological time.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract The K hoy ophiolitic complex in N orthwestern Iran is a part of the T ethyan ophiolite belt, and is divided into two sections: the E astern ophiolite in Q eshlaq and K alavanes ( J urassic– C retaceous) and the W estern ophiolite in B arajouk, C huchak and H essar ( L ate C retaceous). Our chromitites can be clearly classified into two groups: high‐ A l chromitites ( Cr # = 0.38–0.44) from the E astern ophiolite, and high‐ C r chromitites ( C r# = 0.54–0.72) from the W estern ophiolite. The chromian spinels in high‐ A l chromitite include primary mineral inclusions mainly as N a‐bearing diopside and pargasite with subordinate rutile and their formation was probably related to reaction between a MORB (mid‐ocean‐ridge basalt)‐like melt with depleted harzburgite, possibly in a back‐arc setting. Their host harzburgites contain clinopyroxene with higher contents of A l 2 O 3 , N a 2 O , C r 2 O 3 , and T i O 2 relative to W estern harzburgites and are possibly residue after moderate partial melting (~15 %) whereas the Western harzburgite is residue after high partial melting (~25 %). The chromian spinel in the W estern K hoy chromitites contains inclusions such as clinopyroxene, olivine and platinum group mineral‐bearing sulfides. These W estern chromitites were possibly formed at two stages during arc growth and are divided into the moderately high‐ C r# chromitites ( B arajouk and H essar) and the high‐ C r# chromitites ( C huchak A and C ). The former crystallized from island‐arc‐tholeiite ( IAT ) melts during reaction with the host depleted harzburgites, whereas the latter crystallized from boninitic melts (second stage melt) during reaction with highly depleted harzburgite in a supra‐subduction‐zone environment. Based on the mineral chemistry of chromian spinels, pyroxenes, and mineral inclusions, the chromitites and the host peridotites from the E astern and W estern K hoy ophiolites were formed in a back‐arc basin and arc‐related setting, respectively. The K hoy ophiolitic complex is a tectonic aggregate of the two different ophiolites formed in two different tectonic settings at different ages.

Research topics

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • earthquake and tectonic studies
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/iar.12211

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.