MARATTO

article · Marine Pollution Bulletin

Microbial responses to crude oil and cadmium pollution in a tropical coastal environment, Gulf of Guinea

Abstract

), and their combined impact (Cd + Oil) on functional groups within the coastal microbial community, including Synechococcus sp., heterotrophic bacteria, nanoflagellates, eukaryotic phytoplankton, ciliates, and dinoflagellates, as well as on copepod nauplii and copepodite development during six-day incubations. We observed acute toxic effects on heterotrophic ciliates and dinoflagellates, with >50 % reductions in abundance within 6 h and a marked decrease in diversity. Phytoplankton showed growth within the first 24 h due to nutrient replenishment from the protist decay, however, their growth continued to decline after 24 h, with Synechococcus being particularly sensitive to Cd and less affected by Oil. In contrast, heterotrophic bacteria increased in abundance across all treatments, likely benefiting from organic matter released during phytoplankton decay and their high adaptability. Notably, the bacterial genera Marivivens and Rhodovulum became dominant mainly in the Oil-amended treatments. Overall, the microbial groups exhibited diverse responses to the pollutants, with the combined Cd + Oil treatment exerting the strongest negative effects, while crude oil alone had the least impact. These findings highlight the vulnerability of tropical microbial food webs, typically dominated by Synechococcus and microbial grazers, to combined pollutant stress, with potential cascading effects on higher trophic levels and coastal ecosystem productivity. This highlights the need for comprehensive monitoring and conservation efforts in these globally significant, yet understudied, regions.

Research topics

  • Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Heavy metals in environment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118324

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.