article · Pharmaceutics
Background: Measurement uncertainty (MU) is a crucial parameter for ensuring the reliability of analytical methods and the validity of results, as required by ISO 17025:2017. Its estimation is particularly critical for quality control laboratories, where compliance decisions are based on a rigorous interpretation of uncertainties. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the uncertainty associated with an HPLC-UV method for the determination of Metopimazine (MPZ) in a pharmaceutical form, applying two complementary approaches: The ISO-GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) top-down approach and the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). Results: The results of both approaches showed excellent agreement, thus validating the robustness of the evaluation. The analysis of uncertainty sources revealed that the accuracy of the sample volume (VSample) and the calibration standard (Cx) were the dominant contributors, representing 39.9% and 36.2% of the total uncertainty, respectively. Combined, these two factors accounted for 76.1% of the variability, underscoring their critical impact on the assay’s precision. The expanded uncertainty (k = 2, 95% confidence level) was determined to be (99.41 ± 0.69)%, reflecting the method’s reproducibility. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of rigorously controlling calibration standard preparation, sample volume, and repeatability conditions to optimize the reliability of the assay.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17101316
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.