MARATTO

article · Construction Materials

Mechanical and Durability Properties of Concrete with Limestone Calcined Clay Cement: Assessing the Suitability of Tanzanian Kaolinite Clay

2026Open accessMoi University

Abstract

In most African countries, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as silica fume, slag, and fly ash, are scarce, creating a need for alternative low-clinker cement that utilises locally abundant resources. Given the limited availability of SCMs, the development of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) has emerged as an attractive solution. LC3 is a blended binder composed of ground limestone, calcined kaolinite clay, and ordinary Portland cement clinker. This research assessed the mechanical and durability properties of LC3 binders formulated using raw materials obtained from selected deposits in Tanzania. Two samples of clay from the Pugu deposit were selected: Pugu hard clay (PH) and Pugu soft clay (PS). Limestone and gypsum were sourced from Dar es Salaam. LC3 mixes containing 58% CEM I/42.5N were produced and used to make concrete with a water/binder ratio of 0.4. Two control mixes were made, a mix with 100% Portland cement CEM I/42.5 N and a mix with 100% Portland pozzolana CEM II/P-B 42.5 N. In addition, four concrete mixes were designed for the study: LC3-PH, LC3-PS, CEM I + PH (CC-PH), and CEM I + PS (CC-PS). The mechanical properties evaluated included compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength, whilst durability performance was assessed through sulfuric acid resistance, water sorptivity, and absorption. The results demonstrated the superiority of LC3 concrete compared to CEM I and CEM II concretes. For instance, the LC3-PS mix achieved a 90-day compressive strength of 63 ± 2.1 MPa, compared with 62 ± 1.8 MPa for CEM I. Similarly, water absorption was 1.35% and 1.1% for CEM I and LC3 concretes, respectively. Under sulfuric acid exposure, LC3 concrete exhibited the lowest mass loss (1.6%) and strength loss (17.9%) compared with 2.4% and 23% for CEM I and 2.1% and 21% for CEM II, respectively. The enhanced performance of LC3 concrete was attributed to its denser and more refined microstructure, which reduced pore connectivity and improved resistance to the ingress of aggressive agents.

Research topics

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Clay minerals and soil interactions

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/constrmater6040052

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.