article · Discover Environment
In the Abuarie-Addisalem irrigation scheme within the Raya Valley, many productive irrigated lands have become unproductive due to the effects of salinity and sodicity. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performances of four machine learning regression models: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT), Decision Tree (DT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The specific objectives were to (1) identify the most effective spectral indices derived from Landsat 8 OLI imagery for soil salinity mapping, and (2) determine which model provides the most accurate predictions when integrated with these indices. A total of 33 surface soil samples (0–30 cm) were collected to represent 939.46 hectares of land. The analysis was performed trough Google Earth Engine and R software statistical and graphical techniques. Results indicated that GBT and RF models were the most efficient, particularly for the Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSR), achieving a high coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.93 with GBT and 0.902 with RF. RF and GBT produced similar results, classified the study area into slightly saline (31.2%), moderately saline (49.9%), and strongly saline (18.9%). Both models demonstrated lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and efficient for spatial mapping, while DT and SVM exhibited limited performance. Therefore, RF and GBT models are recommended for practical application.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s44274-026-00639-x
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.