MARATTO

article · Nigerian Journal of Medicine

Management of Secondary Glaucoma Postscleral Buckle Surgery: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Southwest Nigeria

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the rate of postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and its management in patients who have undergone scleral buckle surgery as a primary intervention for retinal detachment. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of hospital files of scleral buckle surgeries for retinal detachment from January 2016 to December 2021 at the University College Hospital Ibadan. All patients with a previous history of glaucoma, vitreoretinal surgery, or a combination of vitrectomy and scleral buckling procedures were excluded from the review. An IOP of ≥22 mmHg after surgery was considered elevated. Results: A total of 148 patients’ charts were reviewed with 125 patients (131 eyes) included in the study. There were 81 males (64.8%) and the mean age of patients was 45.2 (±18.8) years, with a range of 5–81 years. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment accounted for 97.7% (128 eyes) of all cases and 118 eyes (90.1%) were recent detachments. Seventy-nine eyes (60.3%) recorded elevated IOP postscleral buckle surgery. The mean elevated IOP postbuckle surgery was 27.9 (±6.2) mmHg and the mean antiglaucoma medications prescribed was 2.4 (±2) with a range of 2–5 medications. Four eyes (5.1%) needed surgical intervention for the elevated IOP. The last follow-up mean IOP was 14.3 (±4.1) mmHg. Conclusion: Elevated IOP frequently complicates scleral buckle procedure and medical treatment is usually sufficient. As a common complication, this should be considered in advance when planning for the procedure, especially in low-income countries like Nigeria where scleral buckling surgery is still in common practice.

Research topics

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Corneal surgery and disorders

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/njm.njm_11_24

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.