MARATTO

review · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Magnitude and predictors of gestational trophoblastic disease in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

20252 citationsOpen accessWoldia University

Abstract

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (GTD) encompasses a spectrum of placenta-related disorders with significant health risks. Despite the varying reported prevalence rates in East Africa, no comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted to synthesize the overall burden and predictors of GTD in this region. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (search period: 2000–2024). We assessed heterogeneity (I 2 and Q tests), pooled estimates using a random-effects model, and evaluated publication bias using funnel plots and Egger’s test. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the findings. Eleven studies were included, revealing a pooled GTD magnitude of 10.5% (95% CI: 8.8–12.3; I 2 = 100%, p < 0.001). Significant predictors included prior GTD history (AOR = 3.2, 95% CI: 0.6–5.7; I 2 = 75.2%, p = 0.018) and grand multiparity (AOR = 8.9, 95% CI: 2.8–15.1; I 2 = 76%, p = 0.041). Subgroup analysis showed that complete molar pregnancies (37.8%, 95% CI: 5.9–69.8) were more prevalent than partial molar pregnancies (11.8%, 95% CI: 9.7–13.9), both with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 100%, p < 0.001). Gestational trophoblastic disease remains a significant public health burden in East Africa, where delayed healthcare access contributes to worsened outcomes. Women with a history of gestational trophoblastic disease or high parity constitute high-risk populations that require targeted screening programs and early intervention strategies to improve their detection and management.

Research topics

  • Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07998-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.