MARATTO

article · International Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields

Machine Learning Surrogate Modeling for Accurate Prediction of GAA ‐ MOSFET Electrical Characteristics

2026Open accessUniversity of Monastir

Abstract

ABSTRACT Machine learning regression models were employed to predict the electrical characteristics of GAA‐MOSFETs using a dataset of 459 simulation points. The models considered input features including gate voltage, drain voltage, channel length, silicon thickness, and metal work functions, with the logarithm of the drain current as the target. Various algorithms—including MLPRegressor, GradientBoostingRegressor, XGBRegressor, and ensemble tree‐based models—were trained with cross‐validation and evaluated on an independent test set. The MLPRegressor achieved the highest predictive performance ( R 2 = 0.9990, RMSE = 0.0946, MAE = 0.0612), closely reproducing simulation results for ON‐ and OFF‐state currents and threshold voltage. Feature importance analysis identified gate voltage and metal work function as the most influential parameters. The model accurately captured the effects of channel length and silicon thickness on device behavior, demonstrating its potential as a fast and reliable surrogate for computationally intensive numerical simulations, enabling rapid design and optimization of nanoscale transistors. In excess of DC behavior, the study is extended to small‐signal RF analysis and the linearity of the cylindrical GAA MOSFET: the transconductance ( g m ), output conductance ( g d ), transconductance generation factor (TGF), unity‐gain cutoff frequency ( f T ), and two‐port Y/S parameters. The simulated device exhibits a maximum transconductance ( g m ) of 107 μS, an intrinsic gain g m / g d of 54.5, and a cutoff frequency f T of 139 GHz. The same MLP model reproduces these RF performance metrics with a coefficient of determination R 2 > 0.97, enabling rapid design and optimization of nanoscale RF transistors.

Research topics

  • Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
  • Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/jnm.70203

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.