MARATTO

article · Water

Machine Learning-Informed Hydrological Response Time Modeling in Tropical Watersheds

Abstract

Flood occurrence in tropical regions is intensifying due to climate variability and land-use change, increasing the need for reliable flood response time estimation. Accurate prediction of flood lag time (TL)—the interval between the centroid of excess rainfall and peak runoff—is critical for flood early warning and water resource planning. However, TL estimation remains challenging in data-scarce regions because of complex interactions among watershed morphology, rainfall characteristics, and runoff generation processes. This study evaluates four machine learning (ML) algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—for predicting TL across twenty gauged watersheds in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Fourteen physiographic and hydro-climatic watershed characteristics were used as predictors. Among the tested models, XGBoost achieved the highest training performance (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.96), while RF showed better generalization in the test dataset (R2 = 0.77, NSE = 0.70, KGE = 0.71). SVM produced the lowest prediction errors (MAE = 0.95; RMSE = 2.25) but had lower explanatory power (R2 = 0.49). To enhance interpretability and practical applicability, ML-based feature importance was used to develop a parsimonious empirical model: TL = 0.8 + 0.011A − 0.023RI, where A is watershed area and RI is rainfall intensity. This model explained 51% of TL variability and retained much of the predictive skill of more complex ML models. The proposed hybrid ML–empirical framework provides a transparent and operational approach for flood response time estimation in tropical highland watersheds. Its broader applicability remains subject to additional watershed-level validation and regional calibration.

Research topics

  • Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/w18172121

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.