MARATTO

article · Biomedicine

Machine Learning-Guided Differential Gene Expression Analysis Identifies A Highly-Connected Seven-Gene Cluster in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

20246 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Sadat City

Abstract

Background: One of the most challenging cancers is triple-negative breast cancer, which is subdivided into many molecular subtypes. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity, the role of precision medicine remains challenging. With the use of machine learning (ML)-guided gene selection, the differential gene expression analysis can be optimized, and eventually, the process of precision medicine can see great advancement through biomarker discovery. Purpose: Enhancing precision medicine in the oncology field by identification of the most representative differentially-expressed genes to be used as biomarkers or as novel drug targets. Methods: By utilizing data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we identified the differentially expressed genes using the linear model for microarray analysis (LIMMA) and edgeR algorithms, and applied ML-based feature selection using several algorithms. Results: A total of 27 genes were selected by merging features identified with both LIMMA and ML-based feature selection methods. The models with the highest area under the curve (AUC) are CatBoost, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, and Multi-Layer Perceptron classifiers. ESR1, FOXA1, GATA3, XBP1, GREB1, AR, and AGR2 were identified as hub genes in a highly interconnected cluster. Conclusion: ML-based gene selection shows a great impact on the identification of hub genes. The ML models built can improve precision oncology in diagnosis and prognosis. The identified hub genes can serve as biomarkers and warrant further research for potential drug target development.

Research topics

  • Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.37796/2211-8039.1467

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.