MARATTO

article · In Silico Research in Biomedicine

Machine learning and structure-based modelling for the identification of allosteric AKT1 inhibitors in ovarian cancer: an in silico approach

Abstract

Aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway plays a critical role in ovarian cancer progression and chemoresistance, with AKT1 representing a key therapeutic target. In this study, an integrated artificial intelligence-driven and structure-based computational workflow was developed to identify new allosteric AKT1 inhibitors. A curated dataset of 3,919 experimentally validated AKT1 inhibitors from ChEMBL was used to train regression models based on Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithms, which were combined through a stacking ensemble approach to enhance predictive performance. A transfer learning-optimized recurrent neural network was subsequently fine-tuned on highly potent inhibitors (pIC 50 ≥ 8.0) to generate 8,995 new candidate molecules. Multi-parameter optimization incorporating predicted potency, Quantitative Estimate of Drug-likeness (QED), Synthetic Accessibility (SA) and Pan-Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) filtering reduced the library to 72 candidates. These compounds were evaluated by Glide Extra Precision docking against the validated AKT1 allosteric binding pocket (PDB ID: 7NH5). TIL 50 and TIL 72 demonstrated docking scores (-10.268 kcal/mol and -9.928 kcal/mol, respectively) comparable to reference inhibitor MK-2206 (-10.287 kcal/mol) and preserved critical interactions with ASN54, GLU85, and TRP80, which are essential for stabilization of the inactive PH-in conformation of AKT1. Collectively, this multi-step computational strategy identified a range of chemically diverse, synthetically accessible AKT1 allosteric inhibitor candidates suitable for further experimental validation.

Research topics

  • PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.insi.2026.100506

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.