article · Bioorganic Chemistry
G-quadruplex (G4) aptamers are promising nucleic acid-based therapeutics, but the role of loop architecture in modulating biological activity remains poorly defined. Here, we present a controlled comparison of two rationally designed, unimolecular antiparallel G4 aptamers, 2MFT and S172, which share the same groove-width scaffold by design, while differing in loop configuration and stack number (2MFT: three stacked tetrads; S172: two stacked tetrads) but differ in loop configuration. S172 contains a central diagonal loop, while 2MFT features two diagonal loops. Both constructs exhibited similar thermal stability and low-nanomolar potency in HeLa cells; however, S172 induced more rapid and pronounced cytotoxicity at 48 h (viability: 59.0 % vs. 70.1 %), accompanied by nearly complete G₁-phase arrest and strong upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes (CASP3, BAX) and downregulation of STAT3 and BCL2. In contrast, 2MFT displayed greater selectivity for cancer cells over normal fibroblasts, indicating a broader therapeutic window. These results identify loop topology as a critical determinant of intracellular activity and support a threshold-based model of G4-mediated apoptotic activation. Our findings provide a structural framework for programmable, topology-driven aptamer design and underscore the value of integrating phenotypic, transcriptomic, and cell-cycle analyses to advance next-generation nucleic acid therapeutics. • Loop topology is identified as a tuneable determinant of G-quadruplex aptamer activity. • Both S172 and 2MFT exhibit EC₅₀ values of ~10 nM in HeLa cancer cells. • S172 triggers early apoptosis, deep G₁ arrest, and robust pro-apoptotic gene upregulation. • 2MFT demonstrates a higher selectivity index, favouring malignant over normal cells. • Programmable apoptosis is achieved through rational engineering of loop topology.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109133
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.