article · Asian Journal of Human Services
Long-term unemployment remains a persistent socio-economic challenge in South Africa, with implications extending beyond labour-market outcomes to psychological well-being.Although previous studies document associations between unemployment and psychological distress, limited longitudinal evidence from South Africa has examined multiple dimensions of distress within a unified panel-data framework.This study investigates the association between long-term unemployment and psychological distress using five waves of the National Income Dynamics Survey (NIDS).A quantitative panel-data design employing random-effects probit regression models is used to estimate the relationship between long-term unemployment and four indicators of psychological distress-depression, trouble focusing, sleeplessness, and fear or anxiety-while controlling for socio-economic and demographic covariates.Average marginal effects are reported to improve interpretability.Long-term unemployment is operationalized as unemployment lasting twelve months or longer among working-age labour-force participants, while psychological distress indicators are derived from original NIDS mental health questions with clearly defined recall periods, response categories, and binary coding procedures.The findings indicate that long-term unemployment is positively and statistically significantly associated with four psychological distress indicators.Individuals experiencing long-term unemployment exhibit higher probabilities of reporting psychological distress outcomes, although the effects remain modest.Higher education and household income are associated with lower levels of psychological distress, whereas female and urban residents report higher levels.The findings are interpreted as associative rather than causal because reverse causality cannot be fully excluded within the observational design.The study contributes longitudinal, multi-indicator evidence on unemployment and psychological distress within South Africa's context of structural inequality and labour-market segmentation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.14391/ajhs.e3004.1.015
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.