MARATTO

article · Infrastructures

Linear and Nonlinear Performance Evaluation of Composite Space Truss Decks in Cable-Stayed Bridges: Suez Canal Bridge Case Study

2026Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

This study investigates the structural performance of a novel composite space truss deck system as an alternative to the conventional steel box girder in cable-stayed bridges. Using the Suez Canal Bridge as a benchmark, comprehensive linear and nonlinear finite element analyses were performed to evaluate the global behavior of both deck configurations under dead, live, wind, and temperature loads. The proposed system consists of a three-dimensional square-on-square truss acting compositely with a 25 cm reinforced concrete slab, designed to optimize stiffness and material efficiency. The results revealed that the composite space truss deck achieved a 5–7% reduction in mid-span deflection under live loading and a 6% increase in torsional rigidity compared with the steel box girder, while maintaining comparable self-weight (490 kg/m2 versus 480 kg/m2). The influence of geometric nonlinearity was moderate, 6.56% for the space truss and 1.64% for the box girder, whereas temperature variations of ±30 °C induced up to a 25.3% change in mid-span deflection, highlighting the space truss’s higher thermal sensitivity. Parametric analyses demonstrated that increasing the truss depth from 2.5 m to 4.0 m enhanced global stiffness by 15%, and using lightweight concrete reduced mid-span deflection by 30%. Overall, the composite space truss system offers superior stiffness-to-weight efficiency, substantial steel savings (two-thirds less), and competitive construction economy, establishing it as a promising solution for medium- and long-span cable-stayed bridges.

Research topics

  • Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures11040112

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.