MARATTO

preprint

Limited Benefit of Emergency Referrals and Cesarean Sections in Reducing Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Uganda: A Cross-sectional Study with Nested Case-Control.

2024Open accessMakerere University

Abstract

not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown Objective To assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes - and evaluate the association between intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE) and i) emergency referrals and ii) emergency cesarean sections (CS) by obstetric risk factors. Design Cross-sectional with a nested case-control study. Setting Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda. Population Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 grams between June and December 2022. Methods We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction was used to assess the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum hemorrhage, prolonged/ obstructed labor, and birth weight. Main outcome measures Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths, and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, cord blood lactate ≥5.5 mmol/L, and Thompson score ≥5). Results Of 6,550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths, and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were high among neonates whose mothers had antepartum hemorrhage (31.3%) and prolonged or obstructed labor (27.2%). Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risks, except in prolonged or obstructed labor. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.51–0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI: 0.39–0.50). Conclusions Neonates born to mothers with obstetric emergencies had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS showed limited benefits in reducing IP-NE, indicating challenges in accessing appropriate care.

Research topics

  • Global Maternal and Child Health

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.22541/au.173104952.21218546/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.