MARATTO

article · Minia Journal of Medical Research

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh repair for inguinal herniaLaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia

2024Open accessMinia University

Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed general surgery operations. Throughout the years there have been many variations and advancements, including open and laparoscopic techniques. Aim of Study: This prospective study compared the outcomes of two distinct surgical methods for inguinal hernia repair at Minia University Hospital laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and open tension-free hernia repair. Patients and Methods: The study was performed on 46 patients admitted to Minia University Hospital in the period from January 2023 to January 2024. The study included patients scheduled for elective hernia repair and was divided into two equal groups. The first group (group A) was operated by Laparoscopic TAPP repair, and the second group (group B) was operated by open tension-free mesh repair. Patients with uncomplicated hernias and men were included in the inclusion criteria. Results: Post-operative After laparoscopic repair, the total time of hospital stay was decreased. Chronic inguinal pain is more prominent in open surgery (12.5%) than in laparoscopic repair(4.3%). The median number of cases who returned earlier to normal daily activity(within two days) was 22 (95.7%) in group A compared to 12 (52.2%) in group B. Conclusion: Laparoscopic TAPP repair was statistically superior to open mesh repair for inguinal hernia regarding patient satisfaction, and comfort after the operation, however open tension-free mesh repair showed shorter operation time than laparoscopic repair, furthermore TAPP was better than open repair group regarding hospital stay, pain score, and early return to work.

Research topics

  • Hernia repair and management
  • Abdominal Surgery and Complications
  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2024.313753.1791

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.