MARATTO

preprint

Knowledge, Practice, and Associated Factors on Electrocardiograph Interpretation Among Nurses Working in Emergency and Intensive Care Units of Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024

2024Open accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> Background Fast ECG interpretation is crucial in reducing patient mortality and morbidity related to heart conditions. Despite its importance, many healthcare providers struggle with proficiency in ECG interpretation. Objective This study aimed to assess nurses' knowledge, practice, and associated factors regarding electrocardiograph interpretation in emergency and intensive care units of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess nurses' knowledge, practice, and associated factors related to electrocardiograph interpretation in selected public hospitals in emergency and intensive care units in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected using structured, self-administered questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between variables. Results Only a quarter of the study participants had good knowledge (n = 60, 23.5%) and good practice (n = 69, 27.1%) regarding ECG strip interpretation. The most frequently recognized ECG strip was asystole. Factors associated with good knowledge and practice included being master’s degree holders, having ECG training, and working in intensive care units. Conclusion This study revealed a concerning lack of knowledge and practice among nurses in ECG interpretation. The findings highlight the need for training programs and experience-sharing initiatives to improve nurses' proficiency in ECG interpretation and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Research topics

  • Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4826823/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.