article · World Journal of Nephrology
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a disproportionate burden in low-resource settings.In these regions, AKI is commonly community-acquired, affects younger patients, and is frequently related to sepsis, hypovolemia, obstetric complications, nephrotoxins, and infections.Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is a cornerstone of supportive care for severe AKI, but its use is strongly shaped by local infrastructure, cost, workforce, and supply chains.Current evidence does not show consistent superiority of continuous KRT, intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), prolonged intermittent KRT, or peritoneal dialysis (PD) in broad AKI populations with respect to survival or kidney recovery.Accordingly, modality choice should be individualized according to patient characteristics and local feasibility.In many African and other low-resource settings, IHD and PD remain the dominant modalities because they are more accessible and scalable than continuous therapies.This review discusses how resource limitations shape AKI KRT practice, with emphasis on Africa, and outlines pragmatic strategies to improve equitable access to life-saving renal support.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5527/wjn.122148
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.