article
<bold>Introduction:</bold> Several prognostic tools are used to assess COPD, notably FEV1 as a percentage of predicted value, the functional parameter on which the spirometric GOLD classification is based. The FEV1 Q proposed by the latest ATS/ERS recommendations on PFTs is defined by a FEV1/0.5 ratio in men (0.4 in women) close to 1, predictive of high mortality. <bold>Methods:</bold> This longitudinal study looked at the evolution of all COPD patients who underwent forced spirometry with bronchodilation testing in 2019. The 2019 FEV1 Q was calculated for all patients and then compared with evolving clinical parameters up to 2024. <bold>Results:</bold> During 2019, 400 forced spirometry with bronchodilation test were performed, of which 87 corresponded to COPD patients. The mean age was 54.6 ± 0.3 years, with a sex ratio of 8.66 and a mean BMI of 25.53 ±4.7 kg/m2. Smoking was present in 86 patients, 44 of whom had quit. The most common comorbidities were diabetes, arterial hypertension and coronary insufficiency. On average, COPD had been diagnosed 4 years previously (between 2 and 11 years). All patients were on background treatment, with good compliance in 58 patients. Two patients were on non-invasive ventilation and 2 on long-term oxygen therapy at home. Forced spirometry in 2019 showed a mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 (post-BD) of 60.98 ± 21%. Mean FEV1 Q was 4.29. It was inversely correlated with mMRC dyspnea (p<10-3), number of hospitalizations (p=0.001), number of emergency room visits (p=0.002) and number of deaths (p=0.004). FEV1 Q in 2019 was close to 1 in 10 patients, 8 of whom died between 2019 and 2024. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> FEV1 Q appears to be a relevant and reliable prognostic indicator. Close follow-up is necessary in patients with low FEV1 Q.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2025.pa5183
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.