MARATTO

article · Applied Economics

Is digital gold a hedge, safe haven, or diversifier? An analysis of cryptocurrencies, DeFi tokens, and NFTs

202421 citationsUniversity of Monastir

In plain language

Rapid expansion in the digital asset market has exposed investors to heightened volatility, driving demand for effective tools to mitigate risk. This research investigates whether gold-backed cryptocurrencies can serve as hedges, safe havens, or diversifiers for digital portfolios. The study analyses the performance of two gold-backed digital tokens against conventional cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens, and decentralised finance tokens during significant market disruptions, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine War. By evaluating hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness across these pairings, the findings establish that gold-backed tokens act consistently as good diversifiers. However, their specific capacity to provide safe haven or hedging benefits fluctuates based on the asset category examined and the precise nature of the economic or geopolitical crisis occurring.

Key takeaways

  • Gold-backed cryptocurrencies serve consistently as effective diversifiers across digital asset portfolios.
  • The hedging and safe haven capabilities of gold-backed tokens vary depending on the specific asset class, including traditional cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and DeFi tokens.
  • The effectiveness of gold-backed cryptocurrencies as protective assets depends heavily on the nature of the crisis, such as global health emergencies or geopolitical conflicts.

Why it matters

Digital assets carry substantial financial risks and volatility. Understanding whether gold-backed tokens can protect investments during global disruptions helps investors manage risk more effectively. It also provides financial regulators and policymakers with crucial evidence on how different classes of digital assets interact during economic and geopolitical crises.

Commercialisation angle

This research provides applied insights for asset managers, digital fund creators, and institutional investors seeking to construct resilient digital investment portfolios or risk management tools. Because the study measures hedge ratios and effectiveness against real market crises, the findings are applied and close to practical use for financial analysts designing cryptocurrency risk models, though the abstract does not indicate direct development of commercial software.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The crypto assets market is growing rapidly, exposing investors to new risks. As a result, finding viable candidates to hedge and diversify crypto portfolios is a critical and timely topic. In this paper, we explore the potential of gold-backed cryptocurrencies as safe haven assets in the context of building a diversified digital assets portfolio. Empirically, we investigate the financial properties (diversification, safe haven, and hedging capabilities) of two gold-backed cryptocurrencies against the three main digital assets categories, i.e. traditional cryptocurrencies, Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) tokens, considering major external and internal crises. We also estimate the hedge ratios and the hedging effectiveness of the considered pairs. Overall, our findings indicate that the examined gold-backed cryptocurrencies are good diversifiers, with varying hedging, and safe haven properties depending on the nature of the crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine War, as well as the digital asset category considered. Several financial implications for investors and policymakers are proposed and discussed.

Research topics

  • Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2299217

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.