MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Animal Science

International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare

In plain language

Understanding local public attitudes is critical for designing successful animal welfare initiatives internationally. A survey of 4,291 members of the public across 14 culturally and geographically diverse nations investigated attitudes towards animals and their welfare. Participants across all surveyed countries generally agreed that the welfare of both farmed and companion animals matters to them, as do legal protections for animals. These results challenge common assumptions that people inevitably value companion animals over farmed species, or that concern for animal welfare is restricted to highly developed nations. In several countries, particularly those reliant on subsistence farming, animal utility and proximity through daily exposure proved more influential than companionship. Because notable variations exist between countries, the study provides country-specific contexts to support the design and implementation of localized animal welfare strategies.

Key takeaways

  • A survey across 14 diverse nations revealed that most participants care about the welfare of both farmed and companion animals.
  • Across all surveyed countries, the public agreed that legal protections for animal welfare are important.
  • The findings challenge assumptions that care for animal welfare is limited to developed nations or that companion animals are always prioritised over farmed animals.
  • In some regions, particularly those engaged in subsistence farming, animal utility and proximity were more significant determinants of attitudes than companionship.

Why it matters

Efforts to improve animal welfare often rely on broad assumptions that overlook local contexts. By showing that public concern for animal welfare is widespread across both developing and developed nations, this research highlights that local values, animal utility, and daily exposure strongly shape public sentiment. Recognising these cultural nuances enables organizations to tailor policies and welfare programmes more effectively to specific regional realities.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate a commercial application pathway or product development opportunity. Instead, the research offers early-stage sociological insights that could be used by international welfare organisations, policy planners, and regulatory bodies to design localized intervention strategies and legislative frameworks based on country-specific public attitudes toward farmed and companion animals.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Our perceptions shape our intentions, our motivations, our behavior, and in doing so, our reality. In this age of the Anthropocene, our perceptions also impact the lives and welfare of other animals. One of the key principles associated with the success of international animal welfare initiatives is an understanding of local audiences and contexts. Additionally, culture by country has been demonstrated to be a significant determinant of attitudes to animals and their welfare. Within this study, we surveyed 4,291 members of the general public on their perceptions of animals and animal welfare across 14 geographically and culturally diverse countries; Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, China, India, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Sudan, Thailand, United Kingdom and United States. For many countries included in this study, this constitutes the first time research of this nature has been conducted. Most participants across all countries agreed that the welfare of both farmed animals and companion animals was important to them, and that laws that protect that welfare were also important. The notion that humans always care more for companion animals in comparison to farmed animals is challenged, as is the notion that care for the welfare of animals is a trademark of highly developed nations alone. It is proposed that the utility of the animals, and proximity by way of exposure are more significant than companionship in some countries, particularly those that are engaged with subsistence farming. Important differences exist by country, and the findings have been presented within the context of each country, for ease of incorporation into localized strategy where suitable.

Research topics

  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2022.960379

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.