MARATTO

article · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Intercropping wheat ( <i>Triticum aestivum</i> ) with faba bean ( <i>Vicia faba</i> <u>)</u> combined with vermicompost and NPS fertilizer application increases crop yields and agronomic efficiency in the humid mid-highlands of Ethiopia

20244 citationsOpen accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

A field study was conducted in Dire and Legedadi watersheds in the humid mid-highlands of Ethiopia to determine the effect of intercropping and application of vermicompost (VC) on crop yield. Eight treatments (two treatments included 100% recommended NPS and urea fertilizer treatment versus 100% recommended VC application. The four other treatments are combinations of 50% of recommended NPS and urea and the 50% of VC rate of applications) were studied on farmers’ fields using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The assessment of these treatments relied on a range of intercropping and agronomic performance metrics, including the land equivalent ratio (LER), crowding coefficient (K), marginal rate of return (MRR). Results revealed that the highest total wheat yield of 4000 kg ha−1 in Dire and 4151.7 in Legedadi site, achieved from the application of 100% recommended NPS + urea fertilizers. Wheat–faba bean intercropped with 50% NPS + Urea and 50% VC added treatment resulted in higher agronomic and recovery efficiency (RE) of N (41.0% and 41.9%) and (124.8% and 126.7%), K (2.91 and 2.38), LER (1.89 and 1.49), system productivity index (5672.02 and 4423.80) and net benefits (US$ 5598.1 ha−1, 5690.8 ha−1) values in Dire and Legedadi sites, respectively. Wheat–faba bean intercropped with half dose NPS + urea and VC added treatment was cost-effective and had the biggest yield advantage in both research locations.

Research topics

  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Agricultural pest management studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2024.2324539

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.