article · Innovative Marketing
Through a quantitative lens, this study examines the effect of interactivity and personalization in digital communication on young individuals’ political participation intentions within a non-Western context, specifically among Moroccan youth. Furthermore, it evaluates the mediating roles of attitude and perceived behavioral control. Adopting a positivist epistemological stance, the study utilized an online survey disseminated via social media. Data were collected during a post-election period in Morocco, a time marked by significant political engagement on social media. Subsequently, a purposive sample of 423 respondents was analyzed using Partial Least Squares regression. The findings reveal a positive and significant effect of both interactivity (p < 0.01; β = 0.363) and personalization (p < 0.01; β = 0.333) on young Moroccans’ political attitudes. However, interactivity exhibited the largest effect. While personalization had a positive effect, only professionally-oriented communications resonated, challenging broader notions of personalization’s universal positive effect on political attitudes. Additionally, perceived behavioral control was positively affected mainly by personalization (p < 0.01; β = 0.200), yet its variance was minimally explained (R² = 0.092) by digital communication features alone, suggesting that other political determinants are at play. Furthermore, both political attitude and perceived behavioral control significantly predicted political participation intentions, with perceived behavioral control demonstrating a stronger effect. Finally, mediation analysis confirmed that personalized interactive communication indirectly stimulates political participation intention through both attitude and perceived behavioral control (p < 0.05). These results extend existing models, highlighting the critical role of interactivity and personalization in shaping youth political participation intention in the Moroccan context.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21511/im.21(2).2025.21
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.