MARATTO

article

Integrating Higher-Order Thinking and Real-Time Simulation in Next-Generation Power Engineering Education

Abstract

Power electronics is a cornerstone of modern electrical engineering, underpinning technologies from renewable energy systems to electric vehicles. Traditional lecture-based methods often emphasise rote learning and procedural skills but provide limited opportunities for higher-order thinking or experiential practice. To meet the needs of Generation Z learners and align with industry expectations, new pedagogical frameworks are required that combine cognitive rigour with authentic, technology-enhanced learning. This study introduces a Higher-Order Thinking Skills with Real-Time Simulation pedagogical framework to enhance learning outcomes in diploma-level power electronics. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods design was applied with 40 students divided into control and experimental groups. The control group received lectures, while the experimental group engaged with the HOTS–RTS framework across four topics: rectifiers, converters, inverters, and applications. Pre- and post-tests, Likert-scale surveys, reflections, and instructor observations provided data for both quantitative (t-tests, effect sizes) and qualitative thematic analysis. The experimental group achieved higher post-test gains (20.1 vs 9.5 points), with a large effect size (d = 1.9). Surveys revealed that 65 per cent of respondents rated RTS as highly effective, and Likert scores improved by 1 or more points in HOTS-related skills. Reflections emphasised clarity, confidence, and collaboration. HOTS–RTS effectively integrates cognitive rigour with real-time practice, aligning with STREAMS principles and equipping learners with next-generation industry competencies.

Research topics

  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Experimental Learning in Engineering

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/engproc2026140008

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.