preprint
<title>Abstract</title> Background Early exposure to surgical skills is essential for developing competence and confidence among undergraduate medical students. However, in low-resource settings, opportunities for structured, hands-on skills training are often limited. Integrating basic surgical skills with anatomy education using low-cost simulation models may offer a feasible approach to addressing this gap. Methods This pilot feasibility study evaluated a one-day basic surgical skills workshop delivered as a pre-conference activity during the Fourth Annual Anatomy Congress in Rwanda. Twenty undergraduate medical students from preclinical and clinical levels were purposively selected. Participants received pre-training instructional materials followed by supervised hands-on sessions on instrument handling, knot tying, and suturing using improvised models, including shoelaces, foam mattresses, and fresh porcine skin. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed knowledge, self-reported confidence, and perceived educational value. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially, with statistical significance set at <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.05. Results Participants were 75% male and 25% female. Most participants (70%) had no prior surgical skills training. While post-workshop knowledge scores increased, the change was not statistically significant ( <italic>P</italic> ≥ 0.05). In contrast, self-reported confidence in instrument handling, knot tying, and suturing increased significantly ( <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.05). Application of skills on porcine skin was rated as the most beneficial component (55%), and 95% of participants rated the workshop as very or extremely effective. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates that a low-cost, anatomy-integrated surgical skills workshop is feasible and highly acceptable to undergraduate medical students in a low-resource setting.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8506753/v1
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.