article · Chemical Physics Impact
• DFT and TD-DFT analyses reveal charge-transfer behavior in oxazine derivatives. • DOS calculations indicate semiconducting features modulated by heteroatoms. • Hirshfeld and MEP analyses identify key supramolecular interaction sites. • Docking studies suggest oxazine scaffolds as promising in silico anti-HMPV leads. Oxazine derivatives 1–3 was investigated through density functional theory (DFT at B3LYP/6-311G basis set, time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) in this study and the molecular Hirshfeld surface analysis (HSA), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) mapping, and molecular docking analyses were utilized to evaluate the electronic, structural and computationally predicted binding affinity. DFT and TD-DFT calculations revealed that the derivatives behave as semiconductors with tunable HOMO–LUMO gaps energies with values ranging from 3.09 to 5.36eV, dominated by intramolecular charge-transfer interactions that modulate their absorption properties. Moreover, Band structure and DOS analysis confirmed their semiconducting behavior, through direct band gaps ranging between 1.78eV to 2.21 eV and sulfur p-orbital contributions to conduction and valence states. MEP analysis highlighted heteroatom-rich regions as electrophilic/nucleophilic centers, supporting their potential to engage in favorable protein–ligand interactions. Hirshfeld surface analysis confirmed that crystal stability is primarily driven by π–π stacking, hydrogen bonding and Van der Waals forces, underlining the cooperative role of weak non-covalent interactions. Molecular docking with Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV) F fusion protein (PDB ID: 5WB0 ) and L polymerase (PDB IDs: 8FPI and 8FPJ ) demonstrated strong binding affinities (–8.0 to –9.8 kcal·mol⁻¹) and stable hydrogen bonding, π–π, and hydrophobic contacts with catalytically relevant residues. The convergence of quantum-chemical insights with docking outcomes underscores the promising role of oxazine derivatives as computationally investigated scaffolds for anti-HMPV drug design, warranting further in vitro and in vivo investigations.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.chphi.2026.101016
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.