article · Journal of Asian and African Studies
This study examined institutional quality and trade competitiveness in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) using panel data and a fixed effect model. It was revealed that while control of corruption, government effectiveness, and political stability, absence of violence and terrorism significantly encourage trade competitiveness by about 33.126%, 91.958%, and 55.004%, weak regulatory quality, rule of law, and lack of voice and accountability significantly discourage trade competitiveness by about 25.331%, 95.599%, and 7.561%. ASEAN governments and their citizens should strive harder to effectively run all-inclusive and democratic governments, encourage strong regulatory quality, impartial rule of law, and voice and accountability.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1177/00219096241303938
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.