article · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania spp. are the protozoan parasites responsible for Chagas disease and leishmaniasis. The treatment of these neglected diseases relies on repurposed drugs and faces several challenges including high toxicity, and the emergence of resistant strain. Therefore, there is a constant demand for promising antiparasitic agents. The present work aimed to investigate seventeen prepared N<sup>1</sup>,N<sup>4</sup>-bisbenzylbutane-1,4-diamines against recombinant T. cruzi and L. infantum as well as their inhibitory effects against the T. cruzi recombinant trypanothione reductase (TcTR). N<sup>1</sup>,N<sup>4</sup>-bis(4-chlorobenzyl)butane-1,4-diamine showed significant trypanocidal activity with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 6.0 ± 0.9 μM with a selectivity index of 4.3. This compound was more active than the positive control, benznidazole (IC<sub>50</sub> of 14.6). It moderately inhibited TcTR with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 55.6 ± 18.6 μM. N<sup>1</sup>,N<sup>4</sup>-bis(4-chlorobenzyl)butane-1,4-diamine also inhibited L. infantum with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 19.3 ± 1.2 μM (SI of 3.4). N<sup>1</sup>,N<sup>4</sup>-bis((E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allyl)butane-1,4-diamine exhibited potent inhibitory effect against T. cruzi (2.4 ± 0.3 μM); However, it also turned out to be highly cytotoxic to the L929 fibroblast cell line. Its inhibitory effect against TcTR was also significant, with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 3.9 ± 1.9 μM. Alongside the two diamines, nine other synthesized derivatives displayed antitrypanosomal activity with IC<sub>50</sub> ranging from 8 to 150 μM. Concerning the leishmanicidal effects, all tested compounds were moderately active. Moreover, during in silico studies of the active compounds using TcTR (PDB ID 4NEW), N<sup>1</sup>,N<sup>4</sup>-bis((E)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)allyl)butane-1,4-diamine emerged as the most promising candidate, displaying both strong binding affinity and significant biological activity.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2026.130541
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.